credible V.S non- credible

My First non-credible website is inventors.about.com

This is a non-credible website because its has more then four ads. The domain is .com which means that the site could be purchased by any person. It show the website a clear author but the author credentials are not stated.

My Second non-credible website is http://www.nbahoopsonline.com/

This is a non-credible website because its has more then four ads. The domain is .com which means that the site could be purchased by any person. This website does not have a clean author. The person or company that made this site has other website the show more info.

My First credible website is http://www.history.com/content/basketball/the-history-of-basketball
The website is credible although it has more then four ads and the domain is an .com.
The website has the focus which means its stays on the topic area. The authors of this website are not clean but the site does have great sources. The sources included An article from Funk & Wagnalls® New Encyclopedia. © 2005 World Almanac Education Group, A WRC Media Company.


My Secoud credible website is http://www.kansasheritage.org/people/naismith.html

This site is credible for many reasons. The first reason is that the domain is .org which means an organiztion ownership of it. The its keep focus on my subject. The sources are also stated. They are previously maintained at the University of Kansas. Updated: 05 Jan 2005. Page copyright 2004, Kansas Heritage Group. The author is also stated. His name is George Laughead Jr.